Wednesday, January 25, 2012

This Day in History: Jan 25, 1905: World's largest diamond found


On January 25, 1905, at the Premier Mine in Pretoria, South Africa, a 3,106-carat diamond is discovered during a routine inspection by the mine's superintendent. Weighing 1.33 pounds, and christened the "Cullinan," it was the largest diamond ever found.


Frederick Wells was 18 feet below the earth's surface when he spotted a flash of starlight embedded in the wall just above him. His discovery was presented that same afternoon to Sir Thomas Cullinan, who owned the mine. Cullinan then sold the diamond to the Transvaal provincial government, which presented the stone to Britain's King Edward VII as a birthday gift. Worried that the diamond might be stolen in transit from Africa to London, Edward arranged to send a phony diamond aboard a steamer ship loaded with detectives as a diversionary tactic. While the decoy slowly made its way from Africa on the ship, the Cullinan was sent to England in a plain box.

Edward entrusted the cutting of the Cullinan to Joseph Asscher, head of the Asscher Diamond Company of Amsterdam. Asscher, who had cut the famous Excelsior Diamond, a 971-carat diamond found in 1893, studied the stone for six months before attempting the cut. On his first attempt, the steel blade broke, with no effect on the diamond. On the second attempt, the diamond shattered exactly as planned; Asscher then fainted from nervous exhaustion.

The Cullinan was later cut into nine large stones and about 100 smaller ones, valued at millions of dollars all told. The largest stone is called the "Star of Africa I," or "Cullinan I," and at 530 carats, it is the largest-cut fine-quality colorless diamond in the world. The second largest stone, the "Star of Africa II" or "Cullinan II," is 317 carats. Both of these stones, as well as the "Cullinan III," are on display in the Tower of London with Britain's other crown jewels; the Cullinan I is mounted in the British Sovereign's Royal Scepter, while the Cullinan II sits in the Imperial State Crown.


Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Moses Sithole: South African Serial Killer (part 3)

Prison Video

On Dec. 3, 1996, a video was shown in the Pretoria Supreme Court. It wasn’t of good quality, but it featured Moses Sithole in prison, speaking about the women he had murdered.
The video was made by fellow inmates in Boksburg Prison not long after Sithole’s arrest. Charles Schoeman, Jacques Rogge and Mark Halligan, former police officers, were involved in a $491,800 diamond robbery in Amanzimtoti in 1995. They also murdered an accomplice. Rogge met Sithole in the infirmary, where the former slept due to his diabetes. Apparently, Sithole asked Rogge if he could steal some pills so that he could commit suicide. But first he wanted to tell his story. Schoeman, Rogge, Halligan and Sithole all signed a contract, whereby they would share the profits from the sale of the story. Sithole’s share was to go to his daughter.
Sithole looks quite comfortable on the video, sitting back and smoking. He describes how the first woman he killed, shouted at him when he asked her for directions. This, according to him, was in July 1995. Apparently he manage to calm her down and arranged to meet her at a later date. That was when he throttled her. ”I cannot remember her name,” he says on the video, according to The Star of Dec. 4, 1996. “I killed her and left her there. I went straight home and had a shower.”
He continues to tell the camera that he has killed 29 women. ”I don’t know where the other nine come from,” he is quoted in the Beeld of the same date. ”If there was blood or injuries, they weren’t my women.”
All his victims had reminded him of the woman who had “falsely” accused him of rape in 1989. On the video he claims that he did not rape any of them, although some apparently offered to sleep with him in order to live. Some women he did not attack, because he saw that they were ”sincere and without pretensions,” according to the Beeld article.
He strangled his victims from behind, because he did not want to look into their eyes. This is interesting. Despite the fact that Sithole liked to inspire fear in his victims by leading them through the rotting corpses of his earlier victims, he did not like blood and he didn’t want to see their faces as he stole their lives. Stewart Wilken, on the other hand, got his main thrill from watching his victims’ eyes bulge at the moment they died. He called this the “jelleybean effect,” and he would throttle and rape them simultaneously so that he could climax at this very moment.
On the video, Schoeman asks Sithole if there is a victim that he recalls more than the others. Sithole tells him about Amelia Rapodile, one of the ten women found at the Van Dyk Mine, as reported by The Star of Dec. 4, 1996: “She started to fight. I gave her a chance to fight and I tell her, if you lose, you die ... She was using her feet and kicked me [Amelia was apparently trained in karate]. Then she tried to grab my clothes, but she could not grab me. I just tell her bye-bye.”
At one stage, while Sithole is describing these murders, he languidly bites into an apple.
Although chilling, it was not the content of the video which led to the drama, but everything surrounding its production.
At first there was no indication as to how Charles Schoeman and his cohorts got their hands on a video camera. The Department of Correctional Services (DCS) wanted to launch an internal investigation when the existence of the video had become known, but Deputy Attorney-General Retha Meintjes asked them to defer since she wanted to keep it secret until the trial. Still, since it is illegal both to make a recording in prison and to publish a prisoner’s life story without the written authorisation of the Commissioner of the DCS, Schoeman and the others faced possible criminal charges. Any potential financial gain was highly unlikely.
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela
There was a postponement at this stage, and when the trial resumed on Jan. 29, 1997, Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, ex-wife of President Mandela, was in attendance. Sithole smiled at her; she only stared back.
A week later it became known that Charles Schoeman did not want to testify in the trial, for fear of his life. Apparently, since his involvement in the Sithole video had been revealed, Schoeman had been threatened. He wrote in a letter to the Boksburg Prison Prisoners Executive Committee, quoted in The Star of Feb. 6, 1997, that ”since the day all this became known, my whole life has been turned upside down and now I am being harassed and intimidated to such an extent that I can no longer see my way open to testify for the prosecution in this matter. I should have kept my mouth shut and stayed out of this affair.” He also claimed a warder had helped him to obtain the video equipment. The content of Sithole’s confession had troubled him to such an extent that he contacted the police.
On Feb. 10, Schoeman did take the stand. He had been promised indemnity for his involvement in the making of the video and all charges surrounding it, provided that he testified honestly. Apparently, they had originally made audio recordings of Sithole’s story. Schoeman contacted the police and Capt. Leon Nel of the East Rand Murder and Robbery Unit provided him with the video recording equipment via Schoeman’s wife. Since there was now police involvement, and Sithole had not been told that the recordings would be used during his trial, nor had he been informed of his rights prior to the recordings, his attorney stated that he would object to its inclusion.
An American voice analysis expert, Loni Smrkovski, was flown to South Africa to testify about the recordings of the man who had phoned Tamsen de Beer. He concurred with Dr. Leendert Jansen’s findings that the voice matched that of Moses Sithole. He also provided a practical example, using the voices of Humphrey Bogart from Casablanca and Rich Little, a voice mimic.
This was followed by days and days of DNA testimony, linking Sithole to numerous victims with varying degrees of certainty. Superintendent Petra Hennop of the Forensic Science Laboratory in Pretoria began by explaining the nature of DNA, the tests involved and the other basics of DNA analysis, since this was still relatively new to South African courts.
The trial dragged on. There was also a trial-within-a-trial to determine whether the confession recorded by the police in 1 Military Hospital shortly after his arrest was admissible, since Sithole claimed he had been coerced and told what to say, without proper representation. In addition, it dealt with Sithole’s state of mind when he had pointed out the crime scenes. He claimed these had also been shown to him by the police. Finally, on July 29, the judge denied Sithole’s accusations and the confessions were accepted into evidence. Detectives proceeded to testify about the scenes Sithole had pointed out.
On Aug. 15, the State closed its case. It had taken almost a year and $229,500.
The defence put Sithole on the stand. Basically, he told the court that he knew nothing, he had done nothing, and everything he had said in his confession and any crime scenes he had pointed out had been fed to him by the police. He did admit to knowing one of the rape victims, Lindiwe Nkosi, stating that her sister had been his girlfriend at that time, but he denied raping her. In addition, he still professed his innocence in relation to the rape for which he had been sent to jail in 1989. The Star of Aug. 27, 1997, described Sithole’s testimony as ”rambling, often incoherent.”
Finally, on Dec. 4, 1997, Justice David Curlewis was ready to pass judgement on Moses Sithole.

Growing Up

Like practically all serial killers, Moses Sithole’s formative years were not ideal. He was born in 1964. His father, Simon Tangawira Sithole, his mother, Sophie, and his five siblings lived in Vosloorus, a historically black area just south of Germiston and Boksburg. While Moses was still a child, his father died and his mother was soon unable to manage financially. When they had to leave their home, Sophie had nowhere to take the children, and consequently decided to leave them at a police station. She made them understand in no uncertain terms that they were not to tell the police officers that she was her mother. The children were placed in an orphanage in Benoni, but the boys were soon transferred to the province of KwaZulu-Natal. Sithole claimed that they were mistreated and he ran away three years later.
Thus, again we find the absent father figure identified by Robert Ressler as a frequent characteristic in the serial killer’s childhood. In addition, the rejection by his mother undoubtedly left an indelible impression on the young Moses, and probably initiated his resentment towards and hatred of women. What is interesting, however, is that his brother Patrick did not choose such a destructive path. Perhaps Patrick’s increased age played some role, but this still reminds us that environmental conditions only explain a part of the picture.

There are many fascinating parallels between the lives and crimes of Moses Sithole and American serial killer Ted Bundy. Bundy, of course, did not grow up in ideal circumstances either. Being conceived illegitimately, his mother, Louise Cowell, went to a home for unwed mothers, leaving her son there for two months after his birth to decide what to do. In the end, she came and took him home, where he was raised somewhat transparently as if he were his grandparents’ adopted son. When Bundy was 5, his mother moved away and later married John Culpepper Bundy. Ted Bundy never really knew where he belonged, and the same is true of Moses Sithole.
Ted Bundy
Ted Bundy
Moses fled from the orphanage and found a place to stay with his brother. Patrick moved to Venda, and not long after, Moses sold the house without permission. It’s not mentioned how old he was. He found employment in a number of menial capacities, on farms and at the numerous gold mines surrounding Johannesburg.
Like Bundy, Sithole apparently didn’t lack female company, although his relationships tended to be fleeting. Sithole told some of his rape victims that a girlfriend had wronged him. Thus we have an absent father figure, a mother who deserted him and a woman who, whether real or imagined, mistreated him in some way. Bundy lost the father figure he maintained that he adored, his grandfather, when his mother moved them away to Tacoma, Washington. In addition, his mother lied to him about his legitimacy for years, and a college woman he coveted for all that she symbolized, broke up with him.
The two men liked to kill quite similarly, although Bundy was perhaps more violent. Although Sithole slapped his early victims, there was never any evidence of blunt force trauma found. Bundy, of course, was quite partial to his crowbar or tyre iron. Both, however, liked to strangle women, and underwear, particularly pantyhose, worked very well. Bundy’s last couple of victims at the Chi Omega sorority house were left face down in their beds, their skulls bashed in. Perhaps, like Sithole, he also preferred to kill from behind.
They killed in fairly rapid succession. Their lust for power and control was not to be easily sated.
Book cover: The Stranger Beside Me
Book cover: The Stranger Beside Me
Interestingly, both had on occasion helped others, even to the point of saving a life. Bundy worked on a crisis line alongside author Ann Rule, who provides testimony in her book, The Stranger Beside Me, that he helped numerous callers, some clearly in the process of committing suicide. He also saved a toddler from drowning in 1970. Sithole helped streetchildren and even reunited some runaways with their parents.
The two men approached their trials differently. Bundy, with his affection for the centre stage, frequently usurped his defence and engage in court theatrics. Sithole, in contrast, preferred to remain silently in the dock, merely smiling as if the extinguished lives of 37 women and one child were all very amusing. Which is indicative of the mindset of both the psychopath and the serial killer—other people are merely objects and props for them to use and abuse according to their whim.
In the end, Sithole was convicted of all the murders he is believed to have committed; Bundy of only three. Bundy received death; Sithole, life.
Neither Ted Bundy nor Moses Sithole employed crude techniques in obtaining victims. Women weren’t forced away at knife- or gunpoint. They weren’t blitzed from behind and dragged away under the cover of night. Although Bundy sometimes killed during the day, sometimes during the night, Sithole invariably lured his victims away in broad daylight. Both frequently took women from amidst crowds. Both were intelligent, organized and extremely efficient.
Bundy, not only having studied psychology, but also receiving training in it, knew that women would not be intimidated by a man in a cast and would be inclined to help such a man struggling to carry or move something. Sithole may not have been formally educated, but he knew that employment opportunities in South Africa were scarce and could be exploited to lure women into a vulnerable situation. Both manage to charm and evince trust from their victims.
Janice Ott, victim
Janice Ott & Denise Naslund, victims
Bundy used numerous disarming techniques—crutches, posing as a police officer. At Lake Sammamish Park, on July 14, 1974, he approached women with his left arm encased in plaster, trying to enlist their help with a ”sailboat.” Janice Ott and Denise Naslund didn’t view him with suspicion and obeyed their helping nature. They paid for their altruism with their lives.
Ted Bundy and Moses Sithole in fact epitomises the horror and fascination of serial killers. They appeared perfectly normal and blended in completely. These weren’t troll-like creatures, creeping closer under the cover of dark, crazed and drooling, snatching daughters away while their parents were sleeping. They walked in the sun, smiling and chatting, mixing with the crowd before leading one member away. To bludgeon and strangle and rape and kill.

The David Selepe Connection

Police were never able to tie Moses Sithole to David Selepe. Of course, this does not preclude such a connection from having existed in some form at some time.
On one hand, there are numerous coincidences and points of overlap between the two stories, while on the other, information and evidence thought to be related to Selepe later turned out to belong to Sithole instead.
Messages were written on the first victim, Maria Monama. Although she was originally attributed to Selepe, she was later believed to have been killed by Sithole. Apparently the 18-year-old was the only victim to have been written on. It would appear to be significant that she was also the first. She a beach, he wrote on her according to the Beeld of Oct. 31, 1996. I am not fighting with you please. This was on the right thigh. On the left one, he wrote, We must stay here for as long as you don’t understand. In retrospect, the last sentence was a grim prophecy. To whom were these messages directed? Who’s the “bitch”—this woman, all women, the women who hurt him in the past? If it’s the woman/women who hurt him, then he was telling this victim that she was not the real target of his rage. He was “not fighting” with Maria, but with this other woman; however, he “must” continue to kill until women come to somehow “understand” his pain. If this interpretation is relatively accurate, it indicates remarkable insight into himself, something serial killers apparently tend to lack according to John Douglas. He could also be speaking to those who would find her, perhaps even the police in particular. He wasn’t “fighting” with the police. Perhaps he wanted someone to “understand” what he was feeling, that he “must” kill these women—who are just “bitches”—to silence his pain? To feel alive?
Amanda Thethe disappeared on Aug. 2, 1994, and was found four days later in Cleveland. Sithole knew Amanda, had visited her house and attended her funeral. Selepe pointed out the location where Amanda’s body had been found. But Sithole was later identified by his own sister as the man photographed while using Amanda’s bank card later on Aug. 2. He was also linked to Amanda through DNA. Did they kill her together? Did Sithole kill her and later told Selepe about it in enough detail so that he knew where the body had been left? Did Sithole by some exceedingly bizarre coincidence have sex with Amanda earlier that day and borrow or steal her bank card, and then Selepe killed her later? Did the police coerce Selepe into pointing out this site? Is it relevant that he was shot dead at this particular scene?
A man phoned Dorah Mokoena’s employer on Sept. 12, 1994, three days after she went missing. He claimed that Dorah had been in an accident and would not be returning to work. He asked that her employer pay her salary into her account. Supposedly she was in a critical condition and needed the money. When the employer asked the man who he was, he remained silent for some time and then gave his name as “Martin.” Sithole wasn’t charged with this murder, and it remains attributed to Selepe. But, “Martin” is the alias that recurs again and again in Sithole’s story. Did Sithole also murder Dorah? That is one possibility. But if Sithole and Selepe did, in fact, know each other, Selepe may have known of the “Martin” alias, and may have appropriated it for himself in this instance. Hence the long wait while he was searching for a name—presumably, Sithole would have been quicker in his response, since he frequently used this alias. Or did Sithole place the call? Did they kill her together?
Joyce Mashabela was found in a patch of veld in Pretoria West on Aug. 19, 1994. On Aug. 15, five days after she had disappeared, a man phoned her employer. He gave his name as “Moses Sima” and said that he had found her identity document in the veld. Her family members collected it from him. Sithole was later charged with Joyce’s murder. Was he the man who had phoned? If not, it’s another fascinating name coincidence. In addition, Peggy Bodile’s body was found in this very same patch of veld on Oct. 7, 1994, having gone missing three days earlier. Sithole wasn’t charged with her murder, and all the bodies attributed to Selepe, apart from Peggy and Joyce (initially) were found in Cleveland. What a coincidence that he would leave this one victim 40 miles away from his graveyard in the exact area where Sithole had left a body two months earlier. Sithole was linked to Joyce’s body through DNA.
Refilwe Mokale disappeared on Sept. 5, 1994. Eyewitnesses saw her speaking with a man on Church Plain in Pretoria the previous day. Apparently, he had offered her a job and arranged to meet her the next day. An identikit was completed and released on Nov. 10. Sithole was later charged with Refilwe’s murder, which means that it was probably his identikit and not Selepe’s—if it was indeed the killer who had spoken with Refilwe on that day. If true, Sithole’s picture had been released to the public after he had killed only five women (as per the charges eventually brought against him).
When Sithole phoned Tamsen de Beer of The Star, he readily admitted being responsible for the bodies found in Atteridgeville and Boksburg, but he specifically denied involvement in the Cleveland murders. On the controversial prison video, Sithole stated that he had killed his first victim in July 1995. Maria Monama, believed by police to have been his first murder, was killed during July 1994, and found in Cleveland.
Then there was the disclosure by Selepe of his two accomplices, “Tito” and “Mandla.” And Sithole’s use of “Mandla” as an alias when he called Monica Gabisile’s grandmother.
David Selepe had been linked ‘positively’ to six of the Cleveland victims, but police has never revealed which six. Even the details of these links, as provided to the press, are sketchy. Police also never answered questions on whether the four victims later attributed to Sithole fell inside or outside the six linked to Selepe. Such instances of nondisclosure in the absence of proper motivation frequently appear to be instances of hiding, or worse, cover-up, and are the most flammable kindling for conspiracy theories.
Sithole claimed he didn’t know David Selepe and that he worked alone. Of course, he also claimed that he never killed anyone. Micki Pistorius believes that Sithole would never admit to collaborating with Selepe, because he craves his ”celebrity status,” and won’t share his notoriety with another.

Judgement

On Dec. 4, 1997, Mr. Justice David Curlewis found Moses Sithole guilty on 40 charges of rape, 38 charges of murder and six charges of robbery. One of his two assessors felt that Sithole should not be held accountable, but the judge and the other assessor did not agree. It took three hours to read the verdict, and the packed courtroom was not happy that sentencing would only be pronounced the next day. Relatives of the victims wanted Sithole delivered to them.
On the day that Sithole’s daughter turned three, Dec. 5, Judge Curlewis sentenced him to a total of 2,410 years in prison. He got 12 years for each of the 40 rapes, 50 years for each of the 38 murders, and another five years for each of the six robberies. These sentences would not run concurrently, and the judge recommended no possibility of parole for at least 930 years. According to the Beeld of Dec. 6, 1997, the Judge Curlewis said that “nothing can be said in favour of Sithole. In this case I do not take leniency into account. What Sithole did was horrible.”
The judge also stated that he would have had no trouble imposing the death penalty, had it still been a viable option. He did not have the necessary faith in the prison authorities nor the parole boards to hand down life sentences. That would’ve meant that Sithole would be eligible for parole in 25 years. ”I want to make it clear,” Judge Curlewis said, according to the CapeTimes of Dec. 5, 1997. “I mean that Moses Sithole should stay in jail for the rest of his life.”
Sithole, who listened to his sentence without any emotion, was taken to C-Max, the maximum security section of Pretoria Central Prison and the highest security cellblock in South Africa. Here he would live with the other 94 prisoners considered to be the most dangerous in the country, including Eugene de Kock of the old Counterinsurgence Unit. Each prisoner is allowed one hour per day outside his cell and three visits per month.
Twelve women lie in pauper graves. There are no names above their heads. No one comes to visit their graves. No one leaves flowers. Their loved ones do not know where they lie.
Sithole has AIDS, and at the time of his trial was estimated to live another five to eight years. At the time of writing, it has been seven years and his health has not waned. In fact, thanks to the excellent medical care he receives in prison, free of charge, his health is now much better than it was at the time of his trial. Like any successful weed, he flourishes despite viral attacks and ill wishes.
Still, Moses Sithole is locked away in C-Max, where he will spend the rest of his days—with himself, his memories and his fantasies.
It’s a lot more than he allowed his victims.

Bibliography

Douglas, JE & Olshaker, M (1997). Mindhunter. London: Arrow Books.
Douglas, JE & Olshaker, M (1998). Journey into darkness. London: Arrow Books.
Doyle, R & Cave, J (Eds) (1992). Serial killers. Alexandria, VA: Time-Life Books.
Lambrecht, IR (2004). Cultural artefacts and the oracular trance states of the sangoma in South Africa. Art and Oracle. Retrieved Sept. 4, 2004, from the World Wide Web <http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/oracle/essaylambrecht.html#sub1>.
Pistorius, M (2000). Catch me a killer. Sandton, South Africa: Penguin Books.
Pistorius, M (2002). Strangers on the street: serial homicide in South Africa. Sandton, South Africa: Penguin Books.
Ressler, RK & Shachtman, T (1995). Whoever fights monsters. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Ressler, RK & Shachtman, T (1998). I have lived in the monster. New York: St Martin’s Press.
To recount the story of Moses Sithole, I have relied on the following sources:
Landman, Ruda (2003, Apr 13). Crawling with evidence. Carte Blanche. Retrieved Nov. 27, 2003, from the World Wide Web <http://www.mnet.co.za/CarteBlanche/Display/Display.asp?Id=2199>.
The electronic archives of Die Burger (<http://152.111.1.251/argief/berigte/dieburger>), Beeld (<http://152.111.1.251/argief/berigte/beeld>) and Independent On-Line (<http://www.iol.co.za>). The latter also contains articles from the following newspapers: CapeTimes and The Star.
The books by Dr. Micki Pistorius and Robert Ressler’s I Have Lived in the Monster.



Moses Sithole: South African Serial Killer (part 2)

Phone Calls

Moses Sithole
Moses Sithole
A handbag was recovered from the Boksburg scene and inside it police found an identity document. This enabled them to identify one of the victims, Amelia Rapodile, quite rapidly. Tracing her last known movements, they learned from her coworkers that she had had an appointment with a man named Moses Sithole (Sit-TALL-lee) on Sept. 7. This was the day on which she had disappeared. Detectives also obtained an application form for Sithole’s Youth Against Human Abuse organization, in which he had offered Amelia a position. When they tracked down the phone number on the application form, they met a woman named Kwazi Sithole in Wattville, an area southeast of Boksburg. She was Moses’ sister, but he did not live there and she did not know where he was.
When Tryphina Mogotsi was identified not long after, detectives were quite certain that they had the right suspect. Tryphina had been a laundry worker at Kids Haven, an organization helping street children in Benoni, which is a town just east of Boksburg. Siphiwe Ngwenya told them that a man had visited Kids Haven and told them about possible jobs at his organisation called Youth Against Human Abuse. He had spoken to Tryphina as well, who was very excited when she told Siphiwe of an appointment they had made to further discuss the offer. Moira Simpson, a social worker, confirmed that Moses Sithole had visited Kids Haven twice. The first time he was accompanied by a photographer from The Star and two destitute teenage girls, to be taken into the home. On the second occasion he came alone, producing the newspaper article written about his Youth Against Human Abuse organization, and told her that he wanted to organise a fund raiser for street children. A few days later, Tryphina went missing.
Despite the tremendous press coverage of the bodies found near Boksburg, substantial rewards being offered for information and even a plea from President Mandela that communities aid the police in their investigation, the killer was unfazed. After all, he was probably feeling pretty omnipotent by now. A mere week after the discovery of the ten bodies at the Van Dyk Mine became widely known, 20-year-old Agnes Sibongile Mbuli disappeared on her way to meet a friend. Her body was found on Oct. 3 at Kleinfontein train station near Benoni.
On the same day, a man called the office of The Star and spoke with a reporter there. Tamsen de Beer answered the phone. The man said that his name was Joseph Magwena, and he was the Gauteng serial killer (Gauteng is the name of the province in which Johannesburg and Pretoria are located). In I Have Lived in the Monster, Robert Ressler notes the caller’s specific words: ‘I am the man that is so highly wanted.’ He told her that he wanted to surrender. The reporter typed out the conversation and contacted the police. The man phoned another three times during Oct., and these calls were recorded by the police. In these four conversations, “Joseph” provided some detailed information about the murders. He said that he began killing after a woman had falsely accused him of rape, for which he was convicted and imprisoned. While in jail, he suffered abuse at the hands of fellow prisoners. “I force a woman to go where I want and when I go there I tell them: “Do you know what? I was hurt, so I’m doing it now. Then I kill them.” He stated that he used the victims’ clothing to strangle them, and preferred underwear because it left no fingerprints. He had used an area near Boksburg for an extended period, but of course anyone reading the newspapers knew this by now. Continuing, however, he said that these women saw the other victims before they died. Although he accepted responsibility for the murders in Pretoria, Atteridgeville and Boksburg, he denied any involvement in the Cleveland killings. He also vehemently denied killing Letta Ndlangamandla, and in particular her 2-year-old son, stating that he loved children. He provided other specifics as well, including the location of a body the police had not yet found, and the detectives believed that the caller was indeed the killer.
Meanwhile, along with the body of an unidentified woman found near Jupiter train station, as per the directions provided by “Joseph,” on Oct. 9, Beauty Ntombi Ndabeni’s body was discovered in Germiston on Oct. 11, the day after she went missing. A comb had been used to tighten her pantyhose around her neck.
Ultimately, Tamsen de Beer (working with the investigating team) organized a meeting with “Joseph” at a train station, but it did not work out the way the detectives had hoped. They decided that it was time for more aggressive tactics, and a picture of their prime suspect, Moses Sithole, was published in newspapers on Oct. 13. They appealed to the public to come forth with any information they might have on this man.
The next day, a body was found at the Village Main Reef Mine near Johannesburg. Shoelaces had been used to bind her neck to a tree. This woman has never been identified.

Capture

A few days after Sithole’s picture appeared in the papers, he contacted his sister’s husband, Maxwell. He said that he needed a gun to protect himself and he arranged with Maxwell to meet him at the Mintex factory in Benoni with a firearm. Sithole’s sister, Kwazi, had already been in contact with the police since they tracked down the phone number on the Youth Against Human Abuse forms, and Maxwell informed the detectives about Sithole’s request.
Captains Vinol Viljoen and Frans van Niekerk seized the opportunity. They met with the factory’s management and organised to have Insp. Francis Mulovhedzi pose as a security guard—unbeknownst to the other guards. At 9 p.m. on Oct. 18, 1995, Sithole arrived at the factory and asked for Maxwell. The other guards told Insp. Mulovhedzi to go and fetch Maxwell, as he was the “new guy” but he argued since he didn’t want to leave Sithole. This made the latter suspicious and he fled. Insp. Mulovhedzi followed him into a dark alley. He identified himself as a police officer, yelling at Sithole to stop, and finally fired two warning shots. But Sithole, despite his claims to the reporter, would not surrender so easily. He came at the policeman with an axe. This is how Insp. Mulovhedzi later described the events in court, as reported in The Star: “He turned back and had an object in his hand and came towards me. My life was in danger and I fired a shot at his legs ... He kept on fighting. He hit me on my right hand and I fired some more shots. He fell to the ground.”
Sithole was shot in the stomach and the leg. He was taken to the Glynwood Hospital in Benoni, where he was operated on the next day.
When Brigadier Suiker Britz, National Commander of the Murder and Robbery Units, heard that Sithole had been shot, his ”heart stopped for a couple of seconds,” he later told Beeld in a Nov. 27, 1998, article. It was like some more déjà vu from the David Selepe case, an incident the press had never really let go. “I prayed the whole time that Sithole wouldn’t die and I called the hospital every hour.”
Sithole survived. Two days later he was transferred to 1 Military Hospital in Pretoria, where security could be kept much tighter. The strict security was probably more to protect Sithole from the community than vice versa, since he wasn’t in much of a condition to escape.
Naturally, news of the arrest of the “Gauteng serial killer” spread like wild fire. Still, it did not bring the relief one would expect. In Wattville, residents were furious that Kwazi Sithole, an inhabitant of Wattville herself, had not come forward with information about her brother sooner. Overall, however, the underlying emotion seemed rather to be related to fear: “We are still afraid. The murders didn’t stop after Selepe’s death, why should they stop now?” someone was quoted in the Beeld. Many seemed convinced that there was another accomplice.
Moses Sithole, police ID
Moses Sithole, police ID
On Oct. 23, Moses Sithole was charged with 29 murders in the magistrates’ court in Brakpan. He was unable to attend due to his injuries.
On Oct. 28, newspapers revealed that Sithole was in all probability HIV-positive. Police refrained from comment. It is uncertain how he contracted the virus, although one of his victims may have been the source.
Of course, unfortunately, Sithole’s HIV status also affected others. During 1993, while Sithole was in jail for a previous conviction, he met a woman visiting one of her relatives. Her name was Martha, and they began writing to each other. When he was released later that same year, he moved in with her in Soshanguve, which is some distance north of Pretoria. Later, when Martha got pregnant, she moved in with her parents in Atteridgeville, and Sithole followed some months later. On Dec. 5, 1994, Martha had a baby girl, whom they named Bridget. In Feb. 1995, Sithole paid lobola for Martha—a tradition among the indigenous African people to pay a number of cattle, historically, or more often these days, a sum of money, to the bride’s family. Later that year, however, they parted ways, after which Sithole apparently slept at train stations. Still, Martha had visited Sithole three times since his arrest. But after the news broke of his possible HIV infection, she would have nothing more to do with him. Both Martha and Bridget were tested; the results are unknown. Martha’s sister was upset with the police for not informing them of Sithole’s infection. She had the following to say in an article in the Beeld: “We were good enough to help the police when they were looking for Moses. The police should have told us, because there are many people living here.”

Conversations Around a Hospital Bed

Meanwhile, the detectives had been questioning Sithole in his hospital bed. Both captains Vinol Viljoen and Frans van Niekerk visited Sithole in 1 Military Hospital, but he was reluctant to answer their questions. Until a female detective entered the room. Then he began describing some of his crimes and masturbated while he did so.
Some of these conversations were recorded. At one point, according to The Star, Sithole said: “I can point out the place in Atteridgeville, as well as in Hercules. That’s where I started. Nearer to Johannesburg I did not kill people, because that’s where I stayed. I did not even count.” The locations were chosen before the victims. He killed only during daytime, and supposedly raped only the “pretty ones.”
He also said, according to the same article in The Star, that in “Atteridgeville I killed many—about 10. I caught them with my hands around the neck and strangled them. I thought of something to tie them up ... I used stockings. I placed it around their necks.” He did not like blood, however. “I heard f--k-all if they spoke to me and thought about other things,” he was quoted as saying in the Beeld. He forced the women to look down while he raped and killed them. While he watched them die, he would masturbate.
Sithole denied working with an accomplice and claimed that there had also been copycats.
During the trial, these confessions came under dispute. Sithole, through his lawyer, accused the police of forcing him to admit his ”guilt.” He claimed that detectives had provided him with the information and a list of victims’ names, and then told him to give these details back on the recording.
Of course, persons accused of crimes frequently claim that the police had somehow forced their confessions. However, the case for the detectives’ integrity was not helped by some other events during the days following Sithole’s arrest. According to the detectives, he did not want legal representation present during the questioning. When Tony Richard, a legal aid attorney, arrived at the hospital, he was informed of this, but he did not believe the police and spoke to Sithole himself. Sithole said that his wife was organising a lawyer. Apparently the detectives continued to speak with Sithole alone. After he admitted to the murders, a magistrate was brought in to take down Sithole’s confession. However, the interpreter told Sithole that he really should have some representation. Magistrate Greyvenstein observed that Sithole appeared to be in pain and when she asked him about a lawyer, he said that he had been unable to attain one and blamed the police for not allowing him to see anyone. She consequently refused to take his confession. Another magistrate was brought to the hospital later, at which time Sithole did confess. At the trial he claimed that the detectives were furious after Magistrate Greyvenstein had left, according to the Beeld, saying that he was making fools of them and he would “see shit” if he didn’t confess to the second magistrate.
On Nov. 3, Sithole was released from 1 Military Hospital and transported to Boksburg Prison, where he had served his earlier sentence for rape, and also near one of his mass graves. He was kept in a solitary cell (where he would reside until his trial finally began just shy of a year later).
In the next couple of days, Sithole was taken to point out the scenes where he had left the bodies. On one morning he complained of pain due to his injuries. Capt. Viljoen went to a café and bought a packet of Smarties (chocolate coated in candy, in the form of a pill). He put some of these into Sithole’s mouth and told him to swallow and not chew. The detective wanted Sithole undrugged while he indicated the crime scenes.
Sithole took the detectives to numerous locations where bodies had been found. Capt. Themba Ndlovu accompanied them and translated everything the detectives said into Zulu so that there would be no misunderstandings. On Nov. 6, he took them to the Gosforth Park mine dumps west of Germiston, where they discovered the last victim, yet another woman who would be laid to rest in a nameless pauper’s grave.
University of Cape Town
University of Cape Town
After these excursions, Sithole was taken to Dr. Lorna Martin, a district surgeon at the time, to determine whether he had been harmed and physically coerced by the police. Since then, Dr. Martin has not only completed her training as a forensic pathologist, but has become the head of the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology at the University of Cape Town in 2004. She described Sithole as ”very charming, very well-spoken ... whatever I asked him, he answered. He was pleasant, he was polite ... Scary” (personal communication, July 12, 2004).

Leading Up to the Trial

The trial of Moses Sithole was a long, expensive, but interesting affair. Not only did it necessarily deal with shockingly gruesome details and include exhaustive testimony on DNA, but there were also some intriguing, if not dramatic, twists.
Of course, it took almost a year to get there.
Sithole himself first appeared in court on Nov. 13, 1995, shuffling in on crutches. Many people, including relatives of the victims, attended, and they were not friendly. Foreseeing an emotional crowd, the building housing the Brakpan Magistrates’ Court was sealed off with razor wire and guarded by heavily armed police officers. Some people were very disappointed when they arrived too late to see the suspect, since his case had already been heard at 7:30 a.m. and was merely postponed for further investigation. They vowed to camp out at the building on the following occasion.
On Dec. 5, Sithole reappeared in the magistrates’ court. His attorney, Tony Richard, presented a letter from psychiatrist Dr. Leon Fine to the judge, proposing that Sithole be sent for clinical observation. Apparently, Sithole had suffered some head injuries during previous assaults and boxing matches, and these may have prevented him from realising the wrongfulness of his actions. It is interesting, however, that, despite not realizing that killing these women was wrong, he nevertheless went to tremendous lengths to cunningly mislead them, to lure them far away from other people, to leave almost no evidence behind, and to remove the victims’ belongings so as to prolong their identification. The judge ordered that Sithole be transferred to the Krugersdorp Prison, where he could be observed at nearby Sterkfontein Psychiatric Hospital.
On Jan. 5, 1996, the process repeated itself, bar the letter and bar the presence of Sithole. On Feb. 6, Sithole did attend, and a third period of 30 days was added. On March 6, the psychiatric reports were finally complete, and the court was informed that Sithole did not exhibit any evidence of injury or disorder which would preclude his comprehension of right and wrong. Hence, he was deemed fit to stand trial. Sithole listened with what would become his characteristic grin. A large contingent of women had gathered outside the building and demanded that Sithole be delivered to them. Their request was denied and Sithole was instead returned to Boksburg Prison.
South African High Court, Pretoria
South African High Court, Pretoria
On May 20, Sithole appeared in the Pretoria Supreme Court, where a date was set for the trial to begin five months later.
In mid-Sept., Sithole received a new, private attorney, Eben Jordaan, whose fees (although 20 percent below the usual rates) would be carried by the State.
On Sept. 30, the newspapers went wild. They reported that Moses Sithole would be charged with 38 counts of murder, 40 counts of rape and 6 counts of robbery. Four of the murder charges related to women previously attributed by the police to alleged Cleveland serial killer, David Selepe. This revelation did not go down well with reporters who had never really accepted the Selepe incident. The fact that one of these women, Amanda Thethe, had been found at the scene Selepe had been pointing out when he was shot, naturally exacerbated the situation even further.
Questioned on whether any of these four were included in the six victims police claimed were positively linked to Selepe at the turn of 1994, they chose not to comment, “as the Sithole case is considered to be sub judice,” quoted in the Cape Times. The names of the six connected to Selepe has never been made public.
Amanda Kebofile Thethe, age 26, was found on Aug. 6, 1994, near Cleveland. The other three victims were: 18-year-old Maria Monene Monama, found on July 16 in Cleveland; 32-year-old Joyce Thakane Mashabela, found on Aug. 19 in Pretoria West; and 24-year-old Refilwe Amanda Mokale, found on Sept. 7 in Cleveland.
Another body, that of Rose Rebothile Mogotsi, had also been added to the charges. Rose was found on Sept. 18, 1994, in Boksburg. She had disappeared three days earlier, a 22-year-old looking for work.

Early Victims

Sithole’s trial finally began on Oct. 21, 1996. Another eminent trial was already underway. During the apartheid years, the Security Police was used to deal with political threats against the government. Organizations such as the African National Congress (now the ruling party), the Pan Africanist Congress, the South African Communist Party, and the like, were banned and many of their leaders and prominent members, such as Nelson Mandela, were imprisoned or at least very closely watched. The C-10 Counterinsurgence Unit, under Col. Eugene de Kock, was involved in numerous atrocities at Vlakplaas particularly during the 1980s. Much hated by the ANC and their military wing during the Struggle, Umkhonto weSizwe, De Kock was put on trial after the ANC won the first democratic election. As Sithole’s trial became imminent, De Kock was already testifying in his, neither man realising that they would be spending the remainder of their lives in the same prison block.
Outside C-Max prison
Outside C-Max prison
On Oct. 21, Moses Sithole was charged with the rapes of 40 women, the murders of 37 women and one child, as well as six counts of robbery. Grinning, he pleaded not guilty.
Deputy Attorney-General Retha Meintjies prosecuted, while Mr Justice David Curlewis presided. Eben Jordaan continued on Sithole’s behalf.
The first three charges related to rapes occurring during 1987 and 1988. These women testified first. Usually, the names of rape survivors are not mentioned. I include their names because they stood up during the trial to face their monster, exposed themselves for the world to see, and helped to lock him away forever. Their courage and their victory should not be hidden.
Patricia Khumalo, age 29, was looking for work in September 1987. On the 14th, her sister introduced her to a man named Martin, whom they both identified as Moses Sithole at the trial. Martin told Patricia that he had work for her in Cleveland. Happy that she would be able to earn some money, she got on the train with him in Boksburg. They stepped off at Geldenhuis station, and ‘Martin’ said that he knew a short cut through the veld. Here he became different. “He grabbed me by the clothes in front of my chest. I was frightened. He ordered me to lie on the ground and raped me,” she told the court, according to the CapeTimes of Oct. 23, 1996. He raped her more than once. ”I pleaded and cried and asked him not to kill me. He said he wouldn’t, because I have the kind of eyes that makes him feel sorry,” she continued, as reported in Beeld on Oct. 23, 1996. While she struggled on the stand to relate the events through her tears, Sithole smiled in amusement. He had tied her hands with her bra, pulled her dress over her head, and ordered her to wait there. The next day was her daughter’s birthday.
Eben Jordaan, Sithole’s attorney, asked Patricia whether it hadn’t been David Selepe. She said no. She had seen Sithole’ picture in the papers after his arrest and recognised him there. And she recognized him now.
Thembi Ngwenya testified that she had met Sithole in Sept. 1988 at the clothing store where she worked. He offered her a better paying job, but she felt that she should first speak to her employer and give notice. But Thembi remembered a friend, Dorcas Kedibone Khobane, who was unemployed, and introduced them. On Sept. 28, Sithole asked 26-year-old Dorcas to accompany him to Cleveland. Again they stopped at Geldenhuis station, and walked through the veld where he slapped her and produced a knife. “He threatened to kill me with it and to cut me into pieces unless I did as he asked,” she told the court, according to the Saturday Star of Oct. 26, 1996. “He pushed me on the ground and took my panties off. He dropped his pants to his knees and he raped me.” The man wasn’t ready to leave, however, and had a conversation with her. “He told me he had a girlfriend in Vosloorus named Sibongile. He said he wanted me to go look for her at her home because she had stolen some things from him, but did not say what. He then asked if we could sleep again.” Dorcas said no, and he raped her for the second time. Again he didn’t leave, but someone approached and he ran off. Although the man had said his name was ‘Samson’, Dorcas identified Moses Sithole as her rapist.
Sibongile Nkosi was 17 in 1988, and involved with Sithole, although she knew him as Martin. While she was testifying, Sithole for once did not smile, but buried his face in his hands. Sibongile testified that she was afraid of him then and still was now. He had frequently beaten her and had threatened the lives of her family if she were to leave him. She described how he would hit her, and then suddenly become friendly if someone visited. Advocate Jordaan told her that his client would deny that he ever laid a hand on her. Sibongile asked whether she should take off her clothes so that he could see the scars.
Lindiwe Nkosi, Sibongile’s sister, testified that ‘Martin’ had asked her whether she wanted to visit her sister in Soweto. It was during October 1988. They took the train and got off at Geldenhuis station. In the veld ‘Martin’ asked her if she wanted to have sex with him. When she refused, he produced a bottle of petrol. He said that he would kill her and burn her if she did not have sex with him. He then proceeded to beat her, rape her and strangle her until she became unconscious. When she came to, ‘Martin’ said that he would kill her and her niece if she said anything. Then he took her home. Lindiwe was 15 years old at the time.
Buyiswa Doris Swakamisa met ’Lloyd Thomas’ in February 1989. He offered her a job on a computer and she accompanied him to the ‘business.’ While they were walking through the veld near Cleveland, he took out a panga (which is somewhat like a machete, and especially employed in cutting the sugar cane in KwaZulu-Natal) from a newspaper he had rolled up under his arm. He said that he was going to have sex with her. Buyiswa told the court, according to The Star of Oct. 30, 1996, that he ‘threw the panga to one side and said if I did not want to have intercourse with him, I could run away, but had to make sure that he did not catch up with me or he would kill me. I just stood there. He came towards me and slapped me and ordered me to take off my clothes. When I did not he slapped me twice with his open hand.” However, Lloyd was unable to rape her. She had to kiss his neck and stick her fingers into his ears so that he could get an erection. Then he raped her. Afterwards he told her that ”he hated women because he once had a child with a girlfriend in Alexandra and that his girlfriend had poisoned the child.” Then he tied her up, took her money and left. She reported the rape to the police.
Some months later, Buyiswa saw Lloyd outside the place where she had found employment in the meantime. She informed the police and Lloyd was arrested, only he gave his name as Moses Sithole to the officers. In a very unprofessional move, Buyiswa had to ride to the police station in the back of the vehicle along with her rapist. He cursed her and said that he should have killed her.
Sithole was found guilty of rape in 1989 and was sentenced to six years, although he maintained that he had been falsely accused. In 1993, he was released for good behavior, yet another testament to the wisdom of this practice, although in all fairness it would only have delayed the inevitable for a couple of years. The State wanted Buyiswa to testify as to Sithole’s modus operandi and also to explain why there had been no crimes during 1989 to 1993.

Testimony

The addition of Amanda Thethe’s murder to the charges against Sithole was wrapped in controversy ever since it became known. Not only had David Selepe been pointing out this scene when he was killed, but Amanda’s killer had used her bank card to withdraw money from an automatic teller machine on three occasions in the days after she was killed. He had been photographed by a security camera, and police had stated previously that the man on this photo was David Selepe. Now Sithole was also charged with this act of robbery.
On Nov. 18, Siphiwe Ngwenya, who had worked at Kids Haven with Tryphina Mogotsi, identified the man on the security camera photo as Moses Sithole, the man who had visited Kids Haven and had had an appointment with Tryphina on the day she disappeared. The nail of death, however, was when Sithole’s sister, Kwazi, told the court that the man on the photo was her brother. She also testified that women frequently phoned her home about job offers.
But there were more disturbing facts that would come to light. Sithole had known Amanda Thethe, and had visited her father’s home some months before she disappeared. She introduced him as Selbie, her boyfriend. She was found on Aug. 6, 1994, raped, her panties and pantyhose stuffed into her mouth, her blouse tied around her throat. Amanda’s aunt saw “Selbie” again—at her niece’s funeral. Serial killers like to visit their ‘graveyards’, dump sites or even attend their victims’ funerals. In doing so, they can relive the fantasy, the memory, the power of their domination over another human being.
Wilhelmina Ramphisa met ”David Ngobeni” in March of 1995. He offered her a job and she filled in an application form. She was probably very disappointed and quite angry when he didn’t keep their appointment to meet again. Of course, months later, when she saw David Ngobeni again, this time on the television news, and learned that he was actually Moses Sithole, believed to have killed more than 30 women, she must have gone ice cold, and then cried from happiness that he never showed.
Many witnesses testified. Fathers described the agony of having to identify their battered and broken daughters. Many tears were shed in that courtroom. Sithole, mostly, just sat and smiled.
Dan Mokwena testified that he had been sitting with Elizabeth Mathetsa outside their place of employment early in 1995. A man walked up to them and Elizabeth introduced him to Dan as Sello, her boyfriend. Dan again saw Sello a week before Elizabeth disappeared on May 25, 1995. Dan identified Moses Sithole as the man he knew as “Sello.”
Piet Tsotsetsi, a truck driver, testified that he received numerous calls on the cellular phone in his truck from women about job offers he had supposedly made. He knew nothing about it. During this time, however, Sithole had been employed at the same company to wash the trucks. Elsie Masango’s sister testified that a man calling himself “Piet Tsotsetsi” had offered Elsie a job shortly before she disappeared. Tsotsetsi stated that the phone calls stopped after Sithole’s arrest.
On Nov. 12, the trial had to be suspended when Sithole began to bleed. He had fallen during the weekend and reopened a previous wound to his leg. He was taken to hospital, leaving a trail of blood in his wake.
Mary Mogotlhoa testified that she had had a relationship with Sithole, whom she knew as “Charles,” shortly before his arrest. Although it had lasted only about two weeks, he had given her a watch during this time, which Tryphina Mogotsi’s mother testified looked just like her daughter’s. Mary described how Sithole laid a charge of rape against her at a police station after their relationship ended, and also accused her of stealing $82 from him.
Monica Gabisile’s grandmother testified that a man identifying himself as “Moses Sithole” had phoned her house prior to Monica’s disappearance in September 1995. They had met a month earlier and he phoned to say that he had found work for Monica in Germiston. She left her grandmother’s house the next day and was never seen alive again. Three days later, a man phoned again. Although he said his name was Jabulane, Monica’s grandmother recognized his voice as that of Sithole. He phoned again before Monica’s funeral, this time identifying himself as Mandla. Again she recognized his voice. Sithole was in custody and claimed that he would be found innocent. He also said Monica got what she deserved and that the grandmother could walk over her body.
Although this speaks to Sithole’s pleasure in bestowing pain on others is the fact that on this occasion, he chose the name “Mandla” instead of the usual “Martin” or any of the other aliases. During his interrogation, David Selepe claimed that he had had two accomplices, namely “Tito” and “Mandla.” Sithole used many names, but this is quite a coincidence. Although Selepe’s supposed accomplices had been mentioned in the newspapers, their names had not been made public. Detectives had spoken to a Mandla who had been detained both at the time of questioning and during the Cleveland murders, but perhaps this was not the right Mandla.
Peter Magubane
Peter Magubane
Peter Magubane, a well-known photographer, testified that he had been contacted by someone from The Star about two streetchildren. Outside the building he met Sithole, who identified himself as ‘Patrick’ (his brother’s name), a girl of 11 and a boy of 14. They took the girl to the Johannesburg Child Welfare and convinced the boy to go back to his parents. At a later date, the photographer was again contacted by a woman, and this time met “Patrick” and two girls as Park Station in Johannesburg. Apparently the three of them had been sleeping there on benches. They took the girls to Kids Haven, where Sithole of course met Tryphina Mogotsi.
Dr. Leendert Jansen, a voice identification specialist, testified that the voice on the police recordings of conversations between “Joseph Magwena” and the reporter Tamsen de Beer—to which she had testified earlier—and that on the recordings he had made of Sithole, belonged to the same man. “I have no doubt that the unknown voice is in reality the voice of Moses Sithole,” he said according to the Beeld of Nov. 26, 1996.
When Sithole’s common-law wife, Martha, entered the court, he was very excited about seeing his 1-year-old daughter. She testified with the child sleeping in her arms. After the proceedings he waved, but Martha didn’t want him to see their daughter. This was the only time during the protracted trial that he cried. Some people laughed at him.
After Insp. Mulovhedzi described the events surrounding Sithole’s apprehension, Eben Jordaan painted a different picture during cross-examination. According to Sithole’s version, he merely bumped into the police officer, and when he turned to say he was sorry, the officer drew his gun and fired multiple shots. Moreover, Sithole never had an axe.
On Nov. 30, via the newspapers, the police requested the public’s help in identifying eight of Sithole’s victims.
And then all the drama started.'